Geek Crack - Latest Comments

Re: Security on Unprotected(Public) WiFi

J. Richard Young — Wed, 26 May 2010 08:25:22 -0000

Learn how to use punctuation correctly please. Nothing makes me more irritate, then reading an article that seems as if it has been written by a 12 year old. That said, if you happen to be a 12 year old; what ARE they teaching in school.

Re: Square Inc.-A sliver of what’s to come.

Anay — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:35:32 -0000

The only thing I could think of that isn't secure is the signing of the signature on the phone. Otherwise, nothing is stored in the app or with Square.

Re: Square Inc.-A sliver of what’s to come.

Ty Clifford — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:56:04 -0000

Great article, 'cept I don't understand how this is would even be remotely close to secure.

Wouldn't the correct way to go about something is to actually have all this stuff at hardware level encryption in the phone? Wave it at the scanner and pay for your item?

There's just something about this that doesn't seem all that secure, especially the fact that it's handled by open information (E.g. developed under the same thing every other app is)

Seriously, it's a great way forward, but .. in a wild environment as such?

Re: Security on Unprotected(Public) WiFi

Jan-Marten de Boer — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:34:28 -0000

Great hearing that from an outsider. You use it more than i do myself ;)

Re: Security on Unprotected(Public) WiFi

biosshadow — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:30:09 -0000

You make a great script, so we just had to share it. I use almost daily at work to able to work on my site at work. Thanks man!

Re: Security on Unprotected(Public) WiFi

Jan-Marten de Boer — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:49:28 -0000

I love the tutorial. It's great for the one who will get comprimised in the first place. Espacially the JMX Project was something interesting ><